Ethics



Does History Have Any Meaning?

By William C. Heffernan

Thank you so much for your kind introduction.  And thanks to the Bergen Society for inviting me back.  By my calculation, fifteen years have passed since I gave my first talk at Bergen.  It’s an understatement to say that I appreciate your invitations.  Whenever you ask me to give a talk, you provide me with an opportunity to arrange ideas in a way I never can when in a classroom or when writing for publication.  Both are somewhat narrow experiences.  I can sense my students’ impatience if I digress to comment on larger issues than the ones they bargained for in signing up for a course.  I don’t even dare risk readers’ impatience in my publications; at most, I include oblique references that suggest a wider frame of reference.  It’s in these talks, then, that I have a chance to think a bit more expansively than I can elsewhere—to go beyond the confines of disciplinary specialization.  I can’t vouch for the success of my efforts.  Perhaps, though, we can agree to define success modestly and say that in this instance it consists of sorting out, rather than solving, perplexing issues.  Assuming agreement on this modest aim, I hope you’ll be satisfied with the results of the talk.

Read more...
 

The Land of Now, Or: How Time Goes By

by Robert Gulack
            There once was a man who was certain that he was always right.  He could prove it, he said – because, to the best of his knowledge, he had never been wrong.
Read more...
 

Roe vs. Wade vs. Socrates

I recently received a pamphlet from the National Organization for Woman (“NOW”).  Its front page said in bold letters:  Keep Abortion Legal NOW. Its text read:
 
Dear Friends of Woman’s Rights:
 
Read more...
 

Free Will: The Last Great Lie

By Robert Gulack 

There are three great comforting lies at the heart of the cruel and corrupt monstrosity we call “Western Civilization”

Read more...
 

When Patriotism & Ethics Clash

The Community Circle platform meeting held on Sunday, August 7, 2005, entitled When Patriotism & Ethics Clash, featured a participatory exercise called Values Voting, in which each person took a position, somewhere on the spectrum from complete agreement to complete disagreement, on a statement that was read to the group.  After people took their positions, there was a brief discussion of the reasons for taking those positions, and then the group moved on to the next statement.
Read more...
 

How to Tell the Difference Between Right and Wrong

By Robert Gulack
© 2005 by Robert Gulack

The world we live in, David Hume tells us, is “the first rude essay of some infant deity who afterwards abandoned it, ashamed of his lame performance”; or the work “of some . . . inferior deity, . . . the object of derision to his superiors”; or, perhaps, “the production of old age and dotage in some superannuated deity.”  In any case, Hume says, it is scarcely what we would have expected “from a very powerful, wise, and benevolent Deity.”  Or, as Woody Allen sums it up, considering God’s advantages, He must be regarded as an underachiever.

Read more...